Welcome to my blog which begins with a story about
itself.
A few months ago I wrote a little piece about my
schooldays and the recent death of one of the Catholic priests I had known
forty-five years ago. I headed it, An Unsatisfactory Dance on the Grave of
Father Peter Orr SJ.
On Tuesday I received an email from a man in New
York. He told me he had been trying to track down a priest who had abused him
in Philadelphia in the early 1980s. He’d thought the man’s name was Peter Ore
but now he suspected it was actually Orr and that he was the same priest I was
writing about. I then wrote back, explaining that I was talking about the
mid-60s in London and there was nothing in the obit I’d seen mentioning time in
America.
The following day he sent me an obituary that he
had seen. There was Fr Orr’s picture. The man described his experiences, how Fr
Orr had groomed him through his mother and then started coming around when his
mum was out. Looking at the picture, I remembered the man’s diffidence but also
his lips and expressions on his face which I now recognize as hurt sexuality.
I was amazed. The experiences of this man confirmed
that I was right in my estimation and condemnation of the priest. I think that
when I wrote my piece, I wasn’t entirely sure in myself that I was being fair.
I can remember shouting at Orr in the classroom – and then being expelled for
the outburst – but I can’t recall what had actually happened. My American
correspondent, not surprisingly, thought I may be in denial about something, that
perhaps events had gone further than I can consciously tap into. I’m pretty
sure, however, that he is wrong about this, particularly as I was ‘assaulted’
or ‘interfered with’ by my sister’s boyfriend during the same period and I have
had no trouble in acknowledging that episode. Probably I was just a bit
sickened by realizing that there were predators out there that I was doing
secret deals with in the sense that their predilection produced benefits for
me, eg a trip to Russia from the priest, sexual experience from the boyfriend,
and also made me realize that I had a certain amount of power over these men.
And not only these men: I’ve written
before that I used to be followed by gays from a Public Toilet somewhere in
Leatherhead. I never interacted with any of them but again I was aware of some
sort of sick latent power I had over these people. They wanted me but I wanted
nothing from them, except some weird feeling of superiority.
I didn’t tell the American guy this stuff because
it wasn’t relevant. I did say that although I take a personal delight every
time I hear of a catholic priest being caught, I also know a) that
inappropriate desire and succumbtion to temptation are human traits that I
share and b) this scapegoating of individuals is a cover-up performed by us
all: soldiers that torture, care workers who don’t care, priests that abuse, these
people are us and, like us, are the product of our systems and beliefs. In this
case, as I have written ad infinitum, the Catholic church itself is an
instrument of abuse and the priests that play with your cock aren’t half as
fucked up as those who tell you that you were born in sin and obedience to
divine fascism will save you.
I suppose at the back of my mind when I wrote about
this disturbed Jesuit was a thought that someone else may read it and respond.
Now it has happened, I’m stunned. Maybe it shows that a story is never over.
What would we do if Peter Orr were still alive? I
guess my answer is probably ‘nothing’ because I never thought to track down any
of the priests. (I kind of assumed they were mostly dead long ago because to me
they were always old.) Also the abuse I received was not sexual, just a
continued brutal assault on my mind, body and spirit. Orr went further with the
American boys than he did with me, so maybe if I’d known that when he was alive
I just might have been tempted to write him a really nasty letter but, as I’ve
said, it is the Pope and his ilk that I detest, not some minor pervert who had
had his life ruined by the stupidity of the catholic priesthood.
Mind you, I did go on the Irish Times website where
you can leave a message of condolence. Which I did. ‘Hooray, another perverted
Jesuit bites the dust!’
Sometimes I decide to throw away things I don’t
use. A book, ‘Shaiva Devotional Songs of Kashmir: Utpaladeva’s
Shivastotravali’, was about to be one of those things until I decided to look
at it. Opening the pages at random, I came across the thirteenth verse of the
fourteenth song, as translated above. An asterisk by Great Death takes us to
the footnote: The Great Death represents
time (kaala), that is, mortality.
Time, in both eastern and Kantian thought, is prior
to the mind. The notion that time necessarily goes forward, and never
backwards, is a hard one to undo. Kaala,
time, is defined as the ‘cloak’ over eternality that produces the limiting
perception of time. (Niyati is the
limitation on all-pervasiveness, kalaa
the limit on omnipotence, vidya on
knowledge, raga is limited sense of
plenitude).
Consider, if you want, these statements from the
esteemed Peter Wilburg.
Space is essentially co-presence
with a field of awareness.
Time is the emergence or
presencing within a field of awareness.
Space-time is linear or
sequential presencing within a field of awareness.
Time-Space on the other hand, is
the simultaneous co-presencing of all phenomena – whether past, present or
future in terms of linear ‘space-time’.
Enjoy.
No comments:
Post a Comment